|
|
 |
|
Looking at the Pro & Con comments may help you decide.
Some riders order extra parts or models so they can try multiple
choices. The additional parts can be returned w/in 90 days for a refund, and that saves some time and S&H costs.
Return Policy : If Mick-O-Pegs don't work for you, let's talk about switching
models, parts or trying other mounting options. If we can't get you comfortable, return them within 90 days of purchase for
a refund (less $30). When returning Mick-O-Pegs, please INSURE THEM, send a copy of your receipt/or tell us when and where
you purchased them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foot position, Pros & cons
DD: Low & forward of the stock foot pegs
Just outside
your brake & shift levers
Legs tucked behind fairing
Can be used like floorboard
CON - not for tall riders
CON
- getting back to controls quickly
DL: Same comments as with Model DD
For shorter riders
ED:
Low and just outside Model DD position
PRO Easier to get back to controls
CON - pegs stick out more
CON - catching
loose pant cuff
G_: Feet spread & forward, but low
GF Straight legs with 32" inseam
GQ Straight legs w/29"
inseam.
PRO - can be positioned to not touch pavement when your bike falls/leans
KA: Forward and low enough
to not conflict with wind deflectors
Below the heat from the radiators (unless you are really tall!!)
Straight leg
w/32" inseam
PRO - tucks out of the way
CON - limited lean when being used
KD: 2" higher from pavement
than KA
29" inseam can usually reach
KL: About another 1" higher than KD
For shorter riders
Foot position, Pros & cons
AA&DF: Low & forward of the stock foot pegs
Just outside
your brake & shift levers
Legs tucked behind fairing
CON - getting back to controls quickly
CON - doesn't work
w/floorboards
GA&EF: 'Work w/floorboards
Low, outside Model AA or DF position
GD gives a 2 1/2"
higher peg position
PRO - Easier getting back to controls
CON - pegs stick out more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
